Skip to content
Linespedia

Cases - WillisV.The Bishop Of Oxford

Topics: classic

(2 Probate Division, 192)         Aid me, Muses! my endeavour is to sing a woful song,         How a very learned bishop in the Arches Court went wrong.         Aid me, for duplex querela is an uninviting theme,         And the practice of the Arches raises no poetic dream.         'Tis the Reverend Child Willis, child in name but not in age,         Comes he to the Court of Arches burning with a noble rage,         Filing his duplex querela, claiming for himself thereby         Vicarage of Drayton Parslow, or to know the reason why.         "Reason why?" the bishop answers; "that is not so far to seek.         Little Latin have you, Willis, innocent are you of Greek.         You were specially examined by my good Archdeacon Pott;         He reported to me promptly, 'Greek and Latin all forgot,         Non idoneus is Willis, minus et sufficiens,         He may have a sanum corpus, but he lacks a sana mens.'"         "Nay," says Willis, "such an answer is but trifling with the court,         I have preached a Latin sermon, and the classics are my forte,         You must name the books I failed in, you must give me every chance         Of a fresh examination at the hands of Lord Penzance."         Lord Penzance supported Willis: "Bishop, you must file," said he,         "Some more tangible objection, some less vague and general plea.         As it stands I cannot gather what it is you ploughed him in,         Whether Hellenistic aorists or the Latin word for sin."         But alas! the world has never known as yet what Willis did,         In the breast of the Archdeacon still it lies a secret hid.         Was his Latin prose defective? Did his style of writing show         More resemblance to Tertullian than to Tullius Cicero?         Were his dates a little shaky? Could it, could it be that he         Confidently made Augustine flourish at a date B.C.?         None will know save Pott, Archdeacon, for alas! the patroness         Showed no mercy to Child Willis in the day of his distress.         She revoked the presentation, leaving Willis in the lurch,         One of undisputed learning preached in Drayton Parslow church.         Doubly barren was his triumph, it was not a twelve-month ere         Death set up his Court of Arches, Willis did not triumph there.

AI analysis available. Enable JavaScript to interact.

About this line

"(2 Probate Division, 192)..."

"Cases - WillisV.The Bishop Of Oxford" is a quintessential example of James Williams's signature style... ### Why We Love This Line At Linespedia, we believe that poetry is the ultimate sanctuary for the soul...

Classified Tags

Related lines

"We sat in the jury-box, twelve were we all,         And the clock was just pointing to ten in the hall,         His Lordship he bowed to the"

"(20 Queen's Bench Division, 494)         When love-sick man descends to folly             And gets engaged, he must not stray,         The jury ta"

"(18 Chancery Division, 109)         Oh for the wily infant who married the widow and made         Profit of coke and of breeze, and never a penny h"

"Those brave old days when King Abuse did reign         We sigh for, but we shall not see again.         Then Eldon sowed the seed of equity"

"Here morning in the ploughman's songs is met     Ere yet one footstep shows in all the sky,     And twilight in the east, a doubt as yet,     S"

"The Text is taken from Percy's Reliques (1765), vol. i. p. 71, 'given from two MS. copies, transmitted from Scotland.' Herd had a very similar bal"

Continue Reading

"We sat in the jury-box, twelve were we all,       ..."

Weekly Poetic Insight

Join our literary Sanctuary

Get the most inspiring lines, poetic analysis, and secret shayaris delivered to your inbox every Sunday.